The Intriguing Discrepancies: Why 3D Scans and Stone Models Aren’t Identical Twins

In dentistry, capturing an accurate representation of a patient’s teeth is crucial for crafting well-fitting restorations. Traditionally, this involved creating a physical model using a mold and impression material (stone model). However, digital scanning technology has emerged as a popular alternative, generating 3D scan models. While both methods aim for accuracy, there can be subtle differences between the final products. Let’s delve into the reasons behind these discrepancies:

The Capture Process:

  • Stone Models: Impression material can distort slightly during removal from the mouth, introducing minor inaccuracies in the final stone model.
  • 3D Scans: While highly precise, scanners may struggle to capture intricate details or reach areas with limited access, potentially leading to minor discrepancies.

Material Properties:

  • Stone Models: Stone models are typically made of gypsum products, which can shrink slightly as they dry.
  • 3D Scans: Digital models are virtual representations and are not susceptible to shrinkage.

Software Interpretation:

  • 3D Scans: The scanning software plays a role in processing the captured data and converting it into a 3D model. While sophisticated, the software may introduce slight variations during this interpretation process.

Minimizing the Discrepancies:

These discrepancies are usually very small and unlikely to affect the final restoration. However, here are some ways to minimize them:

  • Proper Impression Technique: For stone models, following meticulous impression techniques ensures minimal distortion.
  • Scanner Calibration: Regular calibration of the 3D scanner helps maintain optimal accuracy.
  • Software Expertise: Technicians skilled in using the 3D scan software can optimize settings for the best results.

The Future of Accuracy

Both 3D scan and stone models have their strengths and limitations. As technology advances, we can expect even higher levels of accuracy from both methods. Additionally, the ability to combine data from both sources might further enhance the precision of dental models.

Ultimately, the choice between 3D scans and stone models depends on individual needs and preferences. Understanding the reasons behind potential discrepancies empowers both dentists and dental labs to make informed decisions for optimal patient care.