Both 3Shape and Exocad are powerful CAD softwares used for removable partial denture (RPD) / removable frame design, but they have different strengths. Here’s a clear comparison:
FRAME BY 3SHAPE
FRAME BY PARTIALCAD
ADVANTAGE
-
✅ Automation: Has more pre-set design tools, especially for clasps, rests, major connectors → faster for less experienced designers.
-
✅ High integration: Works seamlessly with 3Shape scanners, dental system, and many milling/printing workflows.
-
✅ User-friendly: Interface is polished and guides you step by step, good for beginners.
-
✅ Library rich: Large variety of tooth/attachment libraries.
-
✅ Flexibility: Designers can manually adjust almost everything (clasps, connectors, relief, tissue stop…). Perfect for technicians who want full control.
-
✅ Open system: Works with almost all scanners and CAM software.
-
✅ Cost-effective: Usually cheaper in license fees compared to 3Shape.
-
✅ Preferred by advanced designers: Gives more freedom, especially for complex RPDs and custom designs.
DISADVANTAGE
-
❌ Less flexibility: Harder to customize some fine details compared to Exocad.
-
❌ Cost: Licensing and updates are usually more expensive than Exocad.
-
❌ Closed system: Works best inside 3Shape ecosystem, less “open” to third-party machines.
-
❌ Steeper learning curve: Beginners may find it harder because fewer step-by-step guides.
-
❌ Less automation: More manual work compared to 3Shape → can be slower if technician has little experience.
-
❌ Interface: Not as polished as 3Shape, some steps feel “raw.”
📊 Which do most designers use now?
3Shape: More common in large labs, corporate labs, and clinics — especially in Europe, USA, and Asia. It’s the “industry standard” for many.
Exocad: Very popular among freelance designers, small/medium labs, and cost-conscious users. It’s also the preferred choice when labs want more freedom and open workflow with different machines.
👉 Current trend (2025):
3Shape dominates big labs because of its polished workflow and full ecosystem.
Exocad is rapidly growing among independent designers and labs who need flexibility and cost-effectiveness.